अ
भ्या
स
ही
स
फ
ल
ता
की
कुं
जी
है
।
ह
र
दि
न
थो
ड़ा
स
म
य
टा
इ
पिं
ग
को
दी
जि
ए
।
You crushed the free 1-minute test — go further with a free account to access every timed & page-based test and save your progress.
Kruti Dev is the most widely used legacy Devanagari font in India, and for a large number of state government recruitment tests it is still the layout candidates are examined on. If your notification names Kruti Dev, this is the layout to practise — not InScript, and not Remington Gail, however much more modern they may be. The key positions are what the exam will measure.
Technically, Kruti Dev is not a keyboard layout at all but a font. Typing in it means typing ordinary Latin bytes, which the Kruti Dev font then draws as Devanagari glyphs. That is why a Kruti Dev document opened on a machine without the font turns into unreadable Latin gibberish, and why examination boards have been steadily moving to Unicode. This test takes the honest route: it reproduces the exact Remington-family key positions Kruti Dev uses, so your fingers learn the real thing, but it writes proper Unicode Devanagari to the screen so the text stays readable and your results stay meaningful.
Two habits make Kruti Dev distinctive under the fingers, and both trip up typists coming from Unicode layouts. The short-i matra is struck BEFORE its consonant — you type ि then क to get कि — and the reph is struck AFTER its base consonant even though it is written before it. Those orderings are a direct inheritance from the typewriter, where the carriage had to move in a particular direction, and they are the single most common source of errors when a Kruti Dev typist first practises on a Unicode engine. This test handles the reordering for you, exactly as the font does.
Practise at the length your exam actually sets rather than at whatever feels comfortable. State typing tests commonly run to a fixed passage or a fixed number of minutes, and the skills those demand differ: a short test rewards burst speed, a long one rewards a rhythm you can hold. Match the test length here to the notification and the score you see will mean something.
A page-based typing test inverts the usual arrangement. Instead of typing for a fixed time and seeing how far you get, you are given a fixed passage and measured on how long you take to complete it. The finish line is the end of the text rather than the end of a countdown, and that changes the experience more than it sounds like it should.
The psychological difference is the interesting part. A timed test rewards pushing hard right up to the buzzer, because every extra word counts. A page test rewards steady, uninterrupted progress, because the only route to a good time is not stopping. Many typists find they are calmer here — there is no clock in the corner to watch, and the passage visibly shrinks as you work through it. Others find the opposite, and discover that the countdown was the thing keeping them focused. Trying both is a genuinely useful way to learn how you respond to pressure.
This format also mirrors a real category of exam and workplace typing. Several state-level recruitment tests, court and stenography examinations, and most transcription work specify a passage to be completed rather than a duration to be filled. If your target exam gives you a printed passage and expects it typed, practising against a page rather than a clock is the closer rehearsal.
One page is the right starting point for this format. It is long enough to require sustained attention but short enough to retake several times in a sitting, so you can watch your completion time fall as your accuracy improves. Because there is no clock to run out, errors are punished differently here: every correction adds directly to your total time, which makes the connection between accuracy and speed unusually visible. Typists who slow slightly and stop backspacing routinely finish faster.
Yes, for many state-level recruitment tests, though the picture is shifting. Central examinations have largely moved to Unicode Mangal, while a number of state boards and court or clerical recruitments continue to examine in Kruti Dev. Always check the notification for the exam you are sitting, since boards change this between cycles.
No. This test reproduces the Kruti Dev key positions but renders the result as Unicode Devanagari, so it works in any browser with nothing installed. What you practise is the finger movement, which is the part the exam measures.
It is inherited from the mechanical typewriter, where ि had to be struck first so the carriage ended in the right place. Kruti Dev kept that behaviour, so कि is typed as ि then क. This test applies the same reordering, which is why the character appears to jump into place as you type.
The key positions are essentially the same — both are Remington-family legacy fonts, and a typist fluent in one can use the other almost immediately. They differ in the font files and in which exams and offices adopted them, which is why they are offered here as separate tests.
Let the exam decide. If your notification specifies Kruti Dev, practise Kruti Dev. If it specifies Mangal or Unicode, learn InScript, or Remington Gail if you already have typewriter muscle memory. If nothing constrains you, InScript is the better long-term investment because its output is readable everywhere.
A timed test fixes the duration and measures how much you type. A page test fixes the passage and measures how long you take. The skills overlap heavily, but page tests reward steady uninterrupted progress rather than a strong finish against the clock.
Passage-completion formats appear in various state-level recruitment tests, court and stenography examinations, and most transcription work. Check your exam notification for whether it specifies a duration or a passage — the two demand slightly different preparation.
Not easier, just different. A page typically takes longer than a minute, so it demands more sustained concentration, but the absence of a countdown makes it feel less pressured for many typists. Try both and see which format you handle better.
They cost differently, and more visibly. Every correction adds directly to your completion time, so the trade-off between speed and accuracy is unusually clear. Slowing slightly to avoid backspacing usually produces a faster finish.
Your result screen calculates it for you from the passage length and your completion time, so the figure stays comparable with the timed tests. That lets you track progress across both formats on the same scale.